Submission Preparation ChecklistAs part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
I declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before and is not
currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
I wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and
there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
I confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no
other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. I further confirm that the
order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.
I confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated
with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication,
with respect to intellectual property. In so doing I confirm that we have followed the regulations of
our institutions concerning intellectual property
I understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process. He/she is
responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final
approval of proofs. We confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is
accessible by the Corresponding Author and which has been configured to accept email from
Regular Articles: These should describe new and carefully confirmed findings and procedures should be given in sufficient details in order to be able to verify the work. The length of a full paper should be the minimum required to describe and interpret the work clearly. This is a peer reviewed series.
Discussion Papers: Discussion Papers present contributions that are open for discussion and comment. This series facilitate the dissemination of research to the scientific community and the interested public. Papers addressing relevant issues are welcome. This is a peer reviewed series.
Review Articles: Review Articles should provide a comprehensive and scholarly account of a topic that has direct relevance to agricultural economics (methodological or applied) and that has not recently been covered in the literature. They are usually structured similarly to original research articles but must include a section describing the methods used for selecting, extracting, and synthesizing data. This is a peer reviewed series.
Comment to Policies: Comment to policies presents policy research, research surveys, or research on policy issues. This is a peer reviewed series.
Book Reviews: The RAAE publishes reviews of books on the RAAE relevant topics. The Review article submissions undergo the normal review process. The Review should be from 3 to 5 pages of unformatted text.
Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics by http://www.roaae.org is licensed under the Licence
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation.
Any further distribution of the RAAE papers must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.Deposit Policy / Archiving Policy
We follow Sherpa/Romeo‘s blue archiving policy. Post-print or publisher’s version/PDF is archived, without restrictions.The RAAE has been under review for indexing/tracking/covering by other research databases and services.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.